Moore v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Moore v. State

1913 OK CR 8, 129 P. 71, 8 Okla. Crim. 496, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 22

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 13, 1913

DocketNo. A-1489.

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK CR 8 (Moore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. State, 1913 OK CR 8, 129 P. 71, 8 Okla. Crim. 496, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 22 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

ARMSTRONG, J.

The plaintiff in error, Will Moore, was convicted in the county court of Murray county on a charge of having in his possession, intoxicating liquors for the purpose of selling the same, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days and a fine of $75. We have carefully examined the record and find no error sufficient to justify a reversal of the judgment. No brief was filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error, and no appearance made for oral argument.

This court examined the record for fundamental errors only, and, finding none, the judgment is affirmed; with direction to the trial court to enforce the judgment and sentence.

FURMAN, P. J., and DOYLE, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ARMSTRONG, J.

The plaintiff in error, Will Moore, was convicted in the county court of Murray county on a charge of having in his possession, intoxicating liquors for the purpose of selling the same, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days and a fine of $75. We have carefully examined the record and find no error sufficient to justify a reversal of the judgment. No brief was filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error, and no appearance made for oral argument.

This court examined the record for fundamental errors only, and, finding none, the judgment is affirmed; with direction to the trial court to enforce the judgment and sentence.

FURMAN, P. J., and DOYLE, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK CR 8, 129 P. 71, 8 Okla. Crim. 496, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-state-oklacrimapp-1913.