Moore v. State

43 A.D.3d 1117, 841 N.Y.S.2d 797
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 25, 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a claim, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Waldon, J), dated August 17, 2006, which granted that branch of the claimant’s motion which was for leave to amend the claim to add the total sum claimed and denied its cross motion to dismiss the claim as jurisdictionally defective.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In light of the recent amendment of Court of Claims Act § 11 (b) (L 2007, ch 606, § 1), retroactively abrogating Kolnacki v State of New York (8 NY3d 277 [2007]), the instant claim was not jurisdictionally defective notwithstanding the absence of an ad damnum clause.

The parties’ remaining contentions need not be addressed in [1118] light of our determination. Rivera, J.P., Florio, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. State, 43 A.D.3d 1117, 841 N.Y.S.2d 797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

43 A.D.3d 1117 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Triani v. State
44 A.D.3d 1032 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)