Moore v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Moore v. State

289 A.D.2d 544, 735 N.Y.S.2d 794, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13118

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 31, 2001

DocketClaim No. 92943

StatusPublished

This text of 289 A.D.2d 544 (Moore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. State, 289 A.D.2d 544, 735 N.Y.S.2d 794, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13118 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, the claimant, Cilicia Moore a/k/a Sharon Sheperd, appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Ruderman, J.), dated October 5, 2000, which, after a nonjury trial on the issue of liability, dismissed the claim.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We find no basis to disturb the determination of the Court of Claims that the claimant failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the State of New York was negligent in failing to maintain the area where the claimant fell in a reasonably safe condition under the circumstances (see, Bowers v State of New York, 241 AD2d 760, 761; Condon v State of New York, 193 AD2d 874, 875). Goldstein, J. P., McGinity, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, the claimant, Cilicia Moore a/k/a Sharon Sheperd, appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Ruderman, J.), dated October 5, 2000, which, after a nonjury trial on the issue of liability, dismissed the claim.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We find no basis to disturb the determination of the Court of Claims that the claimant failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the State of New York was negligent in failing to maintain the area where the claimant fell in a reasonably safe condition under the circumstances (see, Bowers v State of New York, 241 AD2d 760, 761; Condon v State of New York, 193 AD2d 874, 875). Goldstein, J. P., McGinity, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 A.D.2d 544, 735 N.Y.S.2d 794, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-state-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack