Moore v. State

541 S.W.3d 732
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 20, 2018
DocketNo. ED 105040
StatusPublished

This text of 541 S.W.3d 732 (Moore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. State, 541 S.W.3d 732 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sean Moore appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
541 S.W.3d 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-state-moctapp-2018.