Moore v. State

211 S.W.3d 623, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 76, 2007 WL 92560
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 16, 2007·No. ED 88406·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*624 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vernon Howard Moore (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims the motion court clearly erred in denying his request for post-conviction relief because he was denied effective assistance of counsel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. State, 211 S.W.3d 623, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 76, 2007 WL 92560 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

211 S.W.3d 623 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Belcher v. State
211 S.W.3d 623 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)