Moore v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Moore v. State

211 S.W.3d 623, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 76, 2007 WL 92560

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 16, 2007

DocketED 88406

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 211 S.W.3d 623 (Moore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. State, 211 S.W.3d 623, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 76, 2007 WL 92560 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

*624 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vernon Howard Moore (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims the motion court clearly erred in denying his request for post-conviction relief because he was denied effective assistance of counsel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI