Moore v. State

877 S.E.2d 174, 314 Ga. 351
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 9, 2022
DocketS22A0583
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 877 S.E.2d 174 (Moore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. State, 877 S.E.2d 174, 314 Ga. 351 (Ga. 2022).

Opinion

314 Ga. 351 FINAL COPY

S22A0583. MOORE v. THE STATE.

COLVIN, Justice.

Nikita Moore appeals her conviction for malice murder arising

out of the 2010 death of her two-year-old son, Ma’Kel Moore-

Tompkins.1 On appeal, Moore claims that the circumstantial

1 The death occurred on December 10, 2010. On April 29, 2011, a Fulton

County grand jury indicted Moore and her boyfriend, Reginald Johnson, on charges of malice murder (Count 1), felony murder predicated on aggravated assault (Count 2), felony murder predicated on cruelty to children in the first degree (Count 3), felony murder predicated on aggravated battery (Count 4), aggravated assault (Count 5), aggravated battery (Count 6), and two counts of cruelty to children in the first degree (Counts 7 and 8). Moore was also indicted for felony murder predicated on cruelty to children in the second degree (Count 9) and cruelty to children in the second degree (Count 10). Moore and Johnson were jointly tried before a jury from August 13 to 21, 2012. The jury found Moore and Johnson guilty as charged. The trial court sentenced both defendants to serve life in prison with the possibility of parole for Count 1 and 15 years concurrent for Count 8. The court merged for sentencing purposes or vacated by operation of law the remaining counts. See Malcolm v. State, 263 Ga. 369, 372-374 (4), (5) (434 SE2d 479) (1993). See also Dixon v. State, 302 Ga. 691, 697-698 (4) (808 SE2d 696) (2017). Moore filed a motion for new trial on September 20, 2012, and amended the motion on August 20, 2020. After conducting a hearing on May 17, 2021, the trial court denied the motion for new trial on November 4, 2021. The case was docketed to this Court’s April 2022 term and submitted for a decision on the briefs. evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support her murder

conviction because it failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis

other than her guilt.2 For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

Construed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdicts, see

Hayes v. State, 292 Ga. 506, 506 (739 SE2d 313) (2013), the evidence

presented at trial showed that, in the latter half of 2010, Moore and

her boyfriend, Reginald Johnson lived together with Ma’Kel. Moore

worked day shifts at a Sonic restaurant, and Johnson worked night

shifts at a McDonald’s. When one adult was at work, the other had

exclusive control over Ma’Kel.

Ma’Kel was in the process of being potty trained, and when he

soiled his diaper, Moore would strike him with a belt or her hand.

Moore allowed Johnson to do the same. On several occasions, the

couple’s disciplinary practices caused Ma’Kel to have bruises and

other visible injuries.

Moore testified that on December 8, 2010, Ma’Kel seemed

2 Moore does not raise any challenge to her conviction for cruelty to children in the first degree. 2 healthy and ate and drank normally that evening. Moore woke up

to get ready for work at around 4:30 the next morning, and Johnson

returned home while she was in the shower. Moore dressed Ma’Kel

and placed him in the car so that Johnson could drive her to work at

about 5:30 a.m. After arriving at Sonic, Moore mentioned to her co-

worker, Linda Carpenter, that her son was not feeling well and was

having a hard time waking up that morning.

In his statements to police, Johnson said that when he arrived

back at home with Ma’Kel, he noticed that Ma’Kel had wet his

diaper. When he questioned Ma’Kel about the soiled diaper, Ma’Kel

walked over to Johnson to give him a hug, as if to apologize. Johnson

then decided to give Ma’Kel a shower, but he could not let go of

Ma’Kel in the shower because his legs were limp. While trying to dry

Ma’Kel, Johnson noticed that the back of his head was swollen.

Johnson called Moore at work to ask what was wrong with Ma’Kel,

saying that he was acting strangely and was unresponsive. Moore

instructed Johnson to bring Ma’Kel back to Sonic so she could check

on him.

3 When Johnson arrived, Moore observed Ma’Kel sleeping in the

car seat with his head to the side. Moore tried waking Ma’Kel by

opening his eyes and “hitting him on his face,” but those attempts

did not work. Johnson prompted her to “feel the back of [Ma’Kel’s]

head,” and she noticed that it “fe[lt] funny.” Carpenter came out of

the restaurant with a wet rag to try to awaken Ma’Kel, but he

remained unresponsive. Moore noticed that Ma’Kel was “breath[ing]

funny,” as if he had asthma. Carpenter encouraged Moore to take

Ma’Kel to the hospital. Before leaving, Moore called her manager

because two people were required to be at the restaurant at all

times. Moore and Johnson waited for the manager to arrive, and, by

the time the manager got there, Ma’Kel had been sitting in the

parking lot for approximately 30 to 40 minutes. During that period,

no one called for an ambulance.

Moore told Johnson to drive her back to their apartment. At

the apartment, Moore got Ma’Kel’s Medicaid card and changed her

shirt because she “didn’t want to walk around in [her] work clothes

and stuff.” Johnson then drove them to a hospital in south Fulton

4 County. On the way to the hospital, Moore noticed that Ma’Kel’s

mouth was “foaming,” and his breathing became more labored. They

arrived at the hospital at around 7:30 a.m., and a doctor who

examined Ma’Kel observed multiple bruises on and around Ma’Kel’s

head, which appeared to have been caused within the prior 24 hours.

The doctor ordered a battery of tests and found a significant

skull fracture, bleeding beneath the scalp and skull, and bruising in

the brain. Moore told the doctor that Ma’Kel had hit his head the

previous day “after falling due to potty-training concerns” but that

he seemed normal afterward. Because this account did not explain

the extent of Ma’Kel’s injuries, the doctor grew concerned about

potential abuse and called the police. The doctor also informed

Moore and Johnson that Ma’Kel would need to be flown to Children’s

Healthcare of Atlanta, Egleston Hospital. The doctor said that

Moore seemed “nonchalant” and Johnson appeared “indifferent”

when they heard this news.

At Egleston Hospital, Ma’Kel was observed to have multiple

bruises on his head and torso, as well as an indentation on the back

5 of his skull line. His temperature was 91 degrees, and he was taking

seven to eight breaths per minute instead of the normal 25 to 30. A

social worker from the hospital concluded that Ma’Kel’s injuries

were consistent with “non-accidental trauma.” At around 11:00 a.m.,

a doctor evaluated Ma’Kel and found him to be “nearly brain dead”

from head trauma, which he concluded was likely inflicted “at least

12 hours” before he received a CT scan at the previous hospital. The

doctor said that the amount of force used to cause the injury was

equivalent to a fall onto concrete from a one-to-two story height and

that a child would not have been able to act normally after such an

injury.

Moore told police officers at Egleston Hospital that Ma’Kel may

have fallen two days prior but then suggested a few minutes later

that he may have fallen that morning. Johnson offered that the

injuries may have occurred while Ma’Kel did somersaults, and

Moore added that Ma’Kel may have scraped his head on a wall while

sleeping. Moore later admitted that, on December 7 or 8, Ma’Kel fell

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jarrett James McCloud v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2024
Payne v. State
897 S.E.2d 809 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2024)
Whittaker v. State
891 S.E.2d 849 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2023)
WARD v. THE STATE (Two Cases)
888 S.E.2d 75 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
877 S.E.2d 174, 314 Ga. 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-state-ga-2022.