Moore v. State

673 So. 2d 190, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5112, 1996 WL 252970
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 15, 1996
DocketNo. 96-1094
StatusPublished

This text of 673 So. 2d 190 (Moore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. State, 673 So. 2d 190, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5112, 1996 WL 252970 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. This is without prejudice to file a writ of mandamus in the trial court if the Department of Corrections does not give defendant proper credit for time served. See Smith v. State, No. 95-3312, — So.2d —[1996 WL 165407] (Fla. 4th DCA Apr. 10, 1996).

POLEN, PARIENTE and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
682 So. 2d 147 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
673 So. 2d 190, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5112, 1996 WL 252970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.