Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Moore v. State

Moore v. State

650 So. 2d 233, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1857, 1995 WL 73580
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 24, 1995
DocketNo. 94-1150
StatusPublished

This text of 650 So. 2d 233 (Moore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. State, 650 So. 2d 233, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1857, 1995 WL 73580 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order revoking appellant’s probation does not set forth the specific conditions of probation which the appellant was found to have violated; therefore, the order is deficient. Cue v. State, 619 So.2d 471 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). While it appears that there may be sufficient justification for revocation of appellant’s probation, the specific grounds are not certain as the order is written. The cause is remanded for the trial court to amend the written order to specify the grounds for violation.

ERVIN, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cue v. State
619 So. 2d 471 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
650 So. 2d 233, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1857, 1995 WL 73580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.