Moore v. State
This text of 537 So. 2d 693 (Moore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Steve Craig MOORE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and Kathleen Stover, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and William A. Hatch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Insufficient evidence was presented to support a conviction for improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon. We find that the trial court abused its discretion in denying appellant's motion for judgment of acquittal on that charge and REVERSE that conviction. The other convictions are AFFIRMED.
SHIVERS, ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
537 So. 2d 693, 1989 WL 5681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.