Moore v. State

483 So. 2d 512, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 463, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6439
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 19, 1986·No. No. 85-433·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an adjudication of guilt for attempted trafficking and possession of drug paraphernalia. Various grounds were raised for reversal. The only matter this court finds necessary to discuss is the allegation of prosecutorial misconduct by the injection into the pro[513]*513ceedings of the fact of a pending forfeiture action concerning the cash found in the defendant’s locked floor safe at the time of the arrest.

In light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt and the immediate curative instruction given by the court, any error which the comment may have caused was obviously harmless. State v. Murray, 443 So.2d 955 (Fla.1984). The convictions are affirmed.

GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., and FED-ER, RICHARD YALE, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. State, 483 So. 2d 512, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 463, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6439 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

483 So. 2d 512 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gonzalez v. State
503 So. 2d 425 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)