Moore v. State

469 So. 2d 951, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1357, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14332
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 4, 1985·No. No. AX-351·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We vacate appellant’s prison sentence and remand for resentencing. After appellant’s probation was revoked, appellant elected to be sentenced under the sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The trial court imposed a sentence of five years of imprisonment, a departure from the sentencing guidelines’ recommended sentence of any nonstate prison sanction, for the offense of burglary of a structure. The trial court failed to reduce to writing its reasons for departure from the guidelines. A written statement of reasons for departure from the recommended guidelines sentence is expressly required by Rule 3.701(d)(ll), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Jackson v. State, 454 So.2d 691 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Millett v. State, 460 So.2d 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Johnson v. State, 462 So.2d 49 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Hernandez v. State, 465 So.2d 577 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

The sentence is vacated, and the cause is remanded for resentencing.

BOOTH, WIGGINTON and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. State, 469 So. 2d 951, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1357, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14332 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

469 So. 2d 951 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Moore
489 So. 2d 1130 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)