Moore v. State

407 So. 2d 311, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21920

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moore v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 392 So. 2d 277 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 15, 1981·No. No. 80-568·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Edward Dean Moore appeals from his conviction of aggravated assault assigning as error the refusal of the trial court to instruct the jury on penalties.

The record discloses a bare request that the penalties instruction be given. There was no objection to the trial court’s refusal to give the instruction and no statement of the grounds of objection.

Appellant having failed to preserve the error, we affirm. See Austin v. State, 406 So.2d 1128, (Fla.4th DCA 1981).

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, C. J., and MOORE and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Edward Dean Moore appeals from his conviction of aggravated assault assigning as error the refusal of the trial court to instruct the jury on penalties.

Appellant having failed to preserve the error, we affirm. See Austin v. State, 406 So.2d 1128, (Fla.4th DCA 1981).

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, C. J., and MOORE and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Moore v. State, 407 So. 2d 311, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21920 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

407 So. 2d 311 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Austin v. State

406 So. 2d 1128 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Opinion

Related