Moore v. State

241 So. 2d 868, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5508
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 15, 1970·No. No. O-94·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a judgment of conviction and sentence based upon his pleas of guilty of the offenses of aggravated assault. It is appellant’s contention that the lower court erred in not determining before it accepted his guilty pleas that such pleas were voluntarily, knowingly and understandingly made. ''

We have given full consideration to the record and briefs of the parties and it appearing therefrom that appellant has failed to demonstrate that prejudicial error was committed in the proceedings below, the judgment appealed herein is affirmed upon the authority of McPherson v. State, 237 So.2d 18 (Fla.App. 1st, 1970). This holding is without prejudice to appellant’s right to challenge the voluntariness of his plea and the validity of the judgment based thereon pursuant to the procedure authorized by Criminal Procedure Rule 1.850, 33 F.S.A.

Affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and SPECTOR and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. State, 241 So. 2d 868, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5508 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

241 So. 2d 868 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderson v. State
245 So. 2d 90 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)