Moore v. State

184 So. 924, 134 Fla. 691, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1170

Opinions

Per Curiam.

In this case plaintiff in error was convicted as principal in the second degree of the offense of assault with intent to commit rape and sued out writ of error.

The case has been briefed and orally argued before this Court and all contentions presented by the plaintiff in error have been carefully considered and must be resolved against the plaintiff in error.

A consideration of the entire record discloses no reversible error and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., and Chapman, J., concur in the opinion and judgment. Brown, J., dissents.