Moore v. State

184 So. 924, 134 Fla. 691, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1170
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 31, 1938
StatusPublished

This text of 184 So. 924 (Moore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. State, 184 So. 924, 134 Fla. 691, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1170 (Fla. 1938).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

In this case plaintiff in error was convicted as principal in the second degree of the offense of assault with intent to commit rape and sued out writ of error.

The case has been briefed and orally argued before this Court and all contentions presented by the plaintiff in error have been carefully considered and must be resolved against the plaintiff in error.

A consideration of the entire record discloses no reversible error and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., and Chapman, J., concur in the opinion and judgment. Brown, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leavine v. State
147 So. 897 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Roe v. State
119 So. 118 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)
Lawson v. State
169 So. 739 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Savage v. State
18 Fla. 909 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1882)
Albritton v. State
32 Fla. 358 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1893)
McCoy v. State
40 Fla. 494 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1898)
Smith v. State
70 So. 943 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1916)
Henry v. State
89 So. 136 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1921)
People v. Dole
55 P. 581 (California Supreme Court, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 So. 924, 134 Fla. 691, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-state-fla-1938.