Moore v. State

970 S.W.2d 299, 334 Ark. 39, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 426

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided July 2, 1998·No. CR 98-478·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

George Mitchell Moore, by his attorney, has filed a motion to file belated appeal.

His attorney, John R. Irwin, admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion, which we shall treat as a motion for rule on the clerk. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

George Mitchell Moore, by his attorney, has filed a motion to file belated appeal.

His attorney, John R. Irwin, admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Moore v. State, 970 S.W.2d 299, 334 Ark. 39, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 426 (Ark. 1998).

Pincite

970 S.W.2d 299 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.