Moore v. State

128 So. 920, 23 Ala. App. 659
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moore v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 Ala. App. 432
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 20, 1930·No. 6 Div. 751.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

No points of decision are involved in this appeal. No exceptions were reserved pending the trial, nor were any special charges requested. This appellant was convicted of the offense of violating the prohibition law of the state by having whisky in his possession. The evidence, which was entirely without conflict, tended to show the guilt of the accused. The corpus delicti was sufficiently proven, and. after conviction, the accused was duly sentenced to perform hard labor for the county.

The proceedings were regular throughout. Let the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. State, 128 So. 920, 23 Ala. App. 659 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

128 So. 920 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.