Moore v. State
5 So. 2d 646, 242 Ala. 189, 1942 Ala. LEXIS 11
Opinion
The statement of the evidence in the opinion of the Court of Appeals going to-corroborate the testimony of the accomplice, Russell, was sufficient to warrant the submission of the case to the jury. Malachi v. State, 89 Ala. 134, 8 So. 104; Slayton v. State, 234 Ala. 1, 173 So. 642.
The writ of certiorari is therefore denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moore v. State, 5 So. 2d 646, 242 Ala. 189, 1942 Ala. LEXIS 11 (Ala. 1942).
5 So. 2d 646 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnson v. State
120 So. 3d 1130 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2009)
Bullock v. State
770 So. 2d 1062 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2000)
Scott v. State
728 So. 2d 164 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1997)
Leitner v. State
672 So. 2d 1371 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1995)
Wilson v. State
690 So. 2d 449 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1995)
Banks v. State
647 So. 2d 46 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1994)
Chevere v. State
607 So. 2d 361 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)
Colvette v. State
568 So. 2d 319 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1990)
Stephens v. State
552 So. 2d 158 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1988)