Moore v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 28, 2007·No. 06-7936·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7936

DONNIE SPELLER MOORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TIMOTHY M. SMITH, Garage Foreman, Individually and in Official Capacities; J. HOWARD LOSIEWICZ, Discipline Hearing Officer, Individually and in Official Capacities; RICH SHOOK, Health Service Administrator, Individually and in Official Capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:06- cv-00911-JFM)

Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 28, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donnie Speller Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Ariana Wright Arnold, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Donnie Speller Moore appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.

Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) action. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. Smith, 1:06-cv-

00911-JFM (D. Md. Oct. 31, 2006). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. Smith, (4th Cir. 2007).

Moore v. Smith (Moore v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related