Moore v. Singletary

624 So. 2d 849, 1993 WL 387108
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 4, 1993
Docket92-2000
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 624 So. 2d 849 (Moore v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. Singletary, 624 So. 2d 849, 1993 WL 387108 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

624 So.2d 849 (1993)

David Lee MOORE, Appellant,
v.
Harry K. SINGLETARY, et al., Appellees.

No. 92-2000.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 4, 1993.

David Lee Moore, appellant, pro se.

No appearance by the State.

*850 PER CURIAM.

Moore's petition for habeas corpus was facially insufficient in that it failed to allege that he had exhausted all available administrative remedies. The decision of the trial court to deny the petition is therefore affirmed. See Moore v. Dugger, 613 So.2d 571 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

ERVIN, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sykes v. State
974 So. 2d 1133 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
State v. Lerman
624 So. 2d 849 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
624 So. 2d 849, 1993 WL 387108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1993.