Moore v. Simmons

Fourth Circuit

Moore v. Simmons

241 F. App'x 938

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2007·No. No. 07-6911·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles C. Moore, Jr. appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Moore v. Simmons, No. 5:06-CT-03143-H (E.D.N.C. May 18, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Charles C. Moore, Jr. appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Moore v. Simmons, No. 5:06-CT-03143-H (E.D.N.C. May 18, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Moore v. Simmons, 241 F. App'x 938 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

241 F. App'x 938 (Moore v. Simmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related