Moore v. Schultz

96 A.2d 732, 12 N.J. 329
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 11, 1953·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Jayne in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Wachenfeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan — 7.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. Schultz, 96 A.2d 732, 12 N.J. 329 (N.J. 1953).

96 A.2d 732 (Moore v. Schultz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lisa Van Horn v. Harmony Sand & Gravel, Inc.
122 A.3d 1021 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2015)
Lo Re v. Tel-Air Communications, Inc.
490 A.2d 344 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1985)
Bates Sand & Gravel Co. v. Commonwealth
404 N.E.2d 81 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1980)
Cartan v. Cruz Construction Co.
215 A.2d 356 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)