Moore v. Schepman

Indiana Supreme Court

Moore v. Schepman

107 N.E. 474, 183 Ind. 711, 1915 Ind. LEXIS 124

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided January 5, 1915·No. No. 22,218·Published

Opinion

Erwin, C. J.

— This was an action brought by appellants, for ejectment and to quiet title to real estate. The complaint is in one paragraph. To this complaint appellees filed joint and sepa[712] rate answers. On the trial by the court special findings were made and conclusions of law stated to the effect that the law was with the defendants, with judgment accordingly.

The facts presented are similar in all respects to the facts s t out and found by the court in Mortimer v. Kessler (1915), 58 In . App. 198, 107 N. E. 84, and. the questions of law the same as decid 1 by this court in Stone v. Elliott (1914), 182 Ind. 454, 106 N. E. 710. On the authority of those cases, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Erwin, C. J.

— This was an action brought by appellants, for ejectment and to quiet title to real estate. The complaint is in one paragraph. To this complaint appellees filed joint and sepa[712] rate answers. On the trial by the court special findings were made and conclusions of law stated to the effect that the law was with the defendants, with judgment accordingly.

The facts presented are similar in all respects to the facts s t out and found by the court in Mortimer v. Kessler (1915), 58 In . App. 198, 107 N. E. 84, and. the questions of law the same as decid 1 by this court in Stone v. Elliott (1914), 182 Ind. 454, 106 N. E. 710. On the authority of those cases, the judgment is affirmed.

Moore v. Schepman, 107 N.E. 474, 183 Ind. 711, 1915 Ind. LEXIS 124 (Ind. 1915).

Pincite

107 N.E. 474 (Moore v. Schepman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related