Moore v. Sayers
This text of 228 A.D. 726 (Moore v. Sayers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Whatever may be proved when the issues in this action are brought to trial, there is nothing in the pleadings and affidavits contained in the record that shows sufficient ground for the exercise of judicial discretion in granting a temporary injunction. (Reformed P. D. Church v. M. A. Building Co., 214 N. Y. 268; McLean v. Woolworth Co., 204 App. Div. 118; affd., 236 N. Y. 612; Whitridge v. Park, 100 Misc. 367; affd., on opinion below, 179 App. Div. 884.) Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur. Order reversed on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for an injunction pendente \it¡e denied, with ten dollars costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 A.D. 726, 238 N.Y.S. 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-sayers-nyappdiv-1930.