Moore v. Robinson

137 S.E. 697, 139 S.C. 393, 1927 S.C. LEXIS 152
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedApril 12, 1927
Docket12188
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 137 S.E. 697 (Moore v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. Robinson, 137 S.E. 697, 139 S.C. 393, 1927 S.C. LEXIS 152 (S.C. 1927).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Watts.

For the reasons stated by his Honor, M. M. Mann, Circuit Judge, it is the judgment of this Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed, and, for the reason that taking the testimony of the plaintiff appellant to be true, she is not entitled to recover, under Sections 5237 and 5333, Vol. 3 Code of Laws 1922.

Affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Cothran, Stabler and Carter and Acting Associate Justice Whiting, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doherty v. Traxler
66 So. 2d 274 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1953)
Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Gordon
254 P.2d 644 (California Court of Appeal, 1953)
Minor v. Higdon, Adm'r
61 So. 2d 350 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1952)
Folk v. United States
102 F. Supp. 736 (W.D. South Carolina, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 S.E. 697, 139 S.C. 393, 1927 S.C. LEXIS 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-robinson-sc-1927.