Moore v. Robinson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Moore v. Robinson

137 S.E. 697, 139 S.C. 393, 1927 S.C. LEXIS 152

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 12, 1927·No. 12188·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Watts.

For the reasons stated by his Honor, M. M. Mann, Circuit Judge, it is the judgment of this Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed, and, for the reason that taking the testimony of the plaintiff appellant to be true, she is not entitled to recover, under Sections 5237 and 5333, Vol. 3 Code of Laws 1922.

Affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Cothran, Stabler and Carter and Acting Associate Justice Whiting, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Watts.

For the reasons stated by his Honor, M. M. Mann, Circuit Judge, it is the judgment of this Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed, and, for the reason that taking the testimony of the plaintiff appellant to be true, she is not entitled to recover, under Sections 5237 and 5333, Vol. 3 Code of Laws 1922.

Affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Cothran, Stabler and Carter and Acting Associate Justice Whiting, concur.

Moore v. Robinson, 137 S.E. 697, 139 S.C. 393, 1927 S.C. LEXIS 152 (S.C. 1927).

Pincite

137 S.E. 697 (Moore v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related