Moore v. Reville

117 S.E. 122, 30 Ga. App. 122, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 295
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 10, 1923
Docket14209
StatusPublished

This text of 117 S.E. 122 (Moore v. Reville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. Reville, 117 S.E. 122, 30 Ga. App. 122, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 295 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The general grounds of the motion for a new trial are expressly abandoned in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error; and the excerpt from the charge of the court, complained of in the only special ground of the motion, when considered in the light of the entire charge and the particular facts of the case, does not require a new trial. ■ Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Blbodworth, JJ., concur.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 S.E. 122, 30 Ga. App. 122, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-reville-gactapp-1923.