Moore v. Reid

34 S.E. 211, 110 Ga. 248, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 485
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 25, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 34 S.E. 211 (Moore v. Reid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. Reid, 34 S.E. 211, 110 Ga. 248, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 485 (Ga. 1899).

Opinion

By the Court.

After a judge has certified a bill of exceptions, and the plaintiff in error has, by serving and filing the same and by causing it and the specified portions of the record in the case to which it relates to be transmitted to the Supreme Court, accepted the certificate of the judge as sufficient, it is too late to apply to this court for a mandamus to compel the judge to certify-further respecting such bill of exceptions. Rogers v. Roberts, 88 Ga. 150. The above is true although counsel for the plaintiff in error may, before receiving from the judge the certified bill of exceptions, have orally expressed some dissatisfaction with the certificate and requested an addition thereto. The proper course in such case, if counsel regarded the certificate as incomplete, would have been to decline to. receive and act upon it, and then apply to this court for a mandamus.

Application for mandamus nisi denied.

All (he Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. Helena Light & Ry. Co.
99 P. 837 (Montana Supreme Court, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 S.E. 211, 110 Ga. 248, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-reid-ga-1899.