Moore v. Rail Logistics, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Moore v. Rail Logistics, Inc.

471 S.W.3d 802, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1020, 2015 WL 5823416

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 6, 2015·No. No. ED 102618·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Gary Moore (“Appellant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) [803] dismissing his claim for unemployment benefits. The Commission affirmed the decision of the Division of Employment Security’s Appeals Tribunal dismissing Appellant’s appeal for failing to appear. We find the Commission did not err in affirming the Appeals Tribunal’s decision.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion! We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Gary Moore (“Appellant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) [803] dismissing his claim for unemployment benefits. The Commission affirmed the decision of the Division of Employment Security’s Appeals Tribunal dismissing Appellant’s appeal for failing to appear. We find the Commission did not err in affirming the Appeals Tribunal’s decision.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion! We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Moore v. Rail Logistics, Inc., 471 S.W.3d 802, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1020, 2015 WL 5823416 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

471 S.W.3d 802 (Moore v. Rail Logistics, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.