Moore v. PRESTIGE PAINTING
751 N.W.2d 42, 481 Mich. 943
This text of 751 N.W.2d 42 (Moore v. PRESTIGE PAINTING) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Moore v. PRESTIGE PAINTING, 751 N.W.2d 42, 481 Mich. 943 (Mich. 2008).
Opinion
Scott R. MOORE, Deceased, and Jessica Douglas, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PRESTIGE PAINTING and Construction Association of Michigan, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*43 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, WEAVER, and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Williams
751 N.W.2d 42 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
751 N.W.2d 42, 481 Mich. 943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-prestige-painting-mich-2008.