Moore v. Premo

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 15, 2011
Docket04-15713
StatusPublished

This text of Moore v. Premo (Moore v. Premo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. Premo, (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUITÎ

RANDY JOSEPH MOORE,  No. 04-15713 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-01-01795- JEFF PREMO, Superintendent of  AJB/JMS OSP, District of Oregon, Respondent-Appellee. Portland

 ORDER

On Remand From The United States Supreme Court

Filed February 15, 2011

Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Marsha S. Berzon, and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

As required by the Supreme Court in Premo v. Moore, dated January 19, 2011, the district court’s order denying the writ of habeas corpus is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Moore v. Premo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-premo-ca9-2011.