Moore v. Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Moore v. Pittsburgh

98 A. 1037, 254 Pa. 185, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 703

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 23, 1916·No. Appeal, No. 56·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The sole question raised on this appeal is the constitutionality of the Acts of May 6, 1915, P. L. 260 and 272. We find nothing in the objections to their constitutionality which would have justified the court below in declaring them to be legislation in contravention of the Constitution, and the decree is affirmed at appellant’s.costs, on the opinion of the learned chancellor dismissing his bill.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The sole question raised on this appeal is the constitutionality of the Acts of May 6, 1915, P. L. 260 and 272. We find nothing in the objections to their constitutionality which would have justified the court below in declaring them to be legislation in contravention of the Constitution, and the decree is affirmed at appellant’s.costs, on the opinion of the learned chancellor dismissing his bill.

Moore v. Pittsburgh, 98 A. 1037, 254 Pa. 185, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 703 (Pa. 1916).

Pincite

98 A. 1037 (Moore v. Pittsburgh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related