Moore v. Peacock

21 S.E. 144, 94 Ga. 523, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 159
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 23, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 S.E. 144 (Moore v. Peacock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. Peacock, 21 S.E. 144, 94 Ga. 523, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 159 (Ga. 1894).

Opinion

On August 3, 1891, the children of Elizabeth Jane Moore and B. T. Moore filed their petition against Peacock as administrator of Rozar, alleging an indebtedness [524]*524of $1,400. On demurrer for want of a cause of action, the petition was dismissed. It shows that on July 21, 1875, lot of land 123 in the 19th district of Dodge county was set apart as a homestead to Elizabeth Jane Moore, now deceased, who was then living in a state of separation from her husband, and plaintiffs being then minors. They have reached their majority within the last four years. They were the beneficiaries of the homestead, and were entitled to the enjoyment of the same, and the profits, possession, use and occupation thereof, but were wrongfully deprived thereof by Hozar during his lifetime and during the fourteen years 1876-1889, he receiving the profits of the land for said time of the value of $100 per year, which his administrator, the defendant, refuses to pay.

DeLacy & Bishop, for plaintiffs. E. A. Smith, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rowan v. Combs
49 S.E. 275 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 S.E. 144, 94 Ga. 523, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-peacock-ga-1894.