Moore v. Padula

501 F. App'x 306
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 27, 2012
DocketNo. 12-7376
StatusPublished

This text of 501 F. App'x 306 (Moore v. Padula) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. Padula, 501 F. App'x 306 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tony L. Moore seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying Appellees’ motion for summary judgment without prejudice and with leave to refile. Appellees move to dismiss on the ground that Moore has appealed an interlocutory order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Moore seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we grant Appellees’ motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
501 F. App'x 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-padula-ca4-2012.