Moore v. Ohio
393 U.S. 221, 89 S. Ct. 460, 21 L. Ed. 2d 393, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 82
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moore v. Ohio, 393 U.S. 221, 89 S. Ct. 460, 21 L. Ed. 2d 393, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 82 (1968).
393 U.S. 221 (Moore v. Ohio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Hirsch
717 N.E.2d 789 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1998)
United States v. William Thomas
586 F.2d 123 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Dwight Timothy Scott, United States of America v. Rufus Williams, United States of America v. Ronnie Holloman, United States of America v. Marion C. Tucker
520 F.2d 697 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
United States v. Scott
520 F.2d 697 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
Bell v. State
519 P.2d 804 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1974)
United States v. Harry Clardy
472 F.2d 578 (Ninth Circuit, 1973)
People v. Charles Brown
204 N.W.2d 41 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1972)
State v. Redeman
485 P.2d 655 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1971)
United States v. Roy L. Capps
435 F.2d 637 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Michael Scarpellino
431 F.2d 475 (Eighth Circuit, 1970)