Moore v. Murphy

Appellate Court of Illinois

Moore v. Murphy

183 Ill. App. 499

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 9, 1913·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice McBride

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Master and servant, § 825*—when remarles of counsel prejudicial. Remark by counsel in closing argument to the jury. “We are not asking you to put your hands in Mr. Murphy’s pockets because he is a rich man and owns a big plant out here,” held, prejudicial. 3. Trial, § 113*—when remarles of counsel improper. Statement of counsel explaining why his first declaration was prepared in the manner it was, held, improper.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice McBride

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Master and servant, § 825*—when remarles of counsel prejudicial. Remark by counsel in closing argument to the jury. “We are not asking you to put your hands in Mr. Murphy’s pockets because he is a rich man and owns a big plant out here,” held, prejudicial. 3. Trial, § 113*—when remarles of counsel improper. Statement of counsel explaining why his first declaration was prepared in the manner it was, held, improper.

Moore v. Murphy, 183 Ill. App. 499 (Ill. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

183 Ill. App. 499 (Moore v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related