Moore v. Murphy

Appellate Court of Illinois

Moore v. Murphy

183 Ill. App. 499

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 9, 1913

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 183 Ill. App. 499 (Moore v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. Murphy, 183 Ill. App. 499 (Ill. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice McBride

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Master and servant, § 825*—when remarles of counsel prejudicial. Remark by counsel in closing argument to the jury. “We are not asking you to put your hands in Mr. Murphy’s pockets because he is a rich man and owns a big plant out here,” held, prejudicial. 3. Trial, § 113*—when remarles of counsel improper. Statement of counsel explaining why his first declaration was prepared in the manner it was, held, improper.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice McBride

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Master and servant, § 825*—when remarles of counsel prejudicial. Remark by counsel in closing argument to the jury. “We are not asking you to put your hands in Mr. Murphy’s pockets because he is a rich man and owns a big plant out here,” held, prejudicial. 3. Trial, § 113*—when remarles of counsel improper. Statement of counsel explaining why his first declaration was prepared in the manner it was, held, improper.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 Ill. App. 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-murphy-illappct-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack