Moore v. Morgan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Moore v. Morgan

168 So. 3d 328, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10374, 2015 WL 4106718

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 8, 2015

DocketNo. 1D15-492

StatusPublished

This text of 168 So. 3d 328 (Moore v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. Morgan, 168 So. 3d 328, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10374, 2015 WL 4106718 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

KELSEY, J.

We affirm the order on appeal, without prejudice to either party’s pursuit of modification before the trial court pursuant to section 61.13(3), Florida Statutes (2014), to address any substantial change of circumstances that may have occurred subsequent to the September 2014 hearing and January 2, 2015 order. See Wade v. Hirschman, 903 So.2d 928, 932-33 (Fla.2005) (articulating substantial change test for child custody modifications); Skirko v. Skirko, 677 So.2d 885, 887 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (modification was warranted where substantial change of circumstances had occurred, including child’s school schedule and parents’ places of residence and work hours; and child’s best interests were served by modification).

THOMAS and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KELSEY, J.

We affirm the order on appeal, without prejudice to either party’s pursuit of modification before the trial court pursuant to section 61.13(3), Florida Statutes (2014), to address any substantial change of circumstances that may have occurred subsequent to the September 2014 hearing and January 2, 2015 order. See Wade v. Hirschman, 903 So.2d 928, 932-33 (Fla.2005) (articulating substantial change test for child custody modifications); Skirko v. Skirko, 677 So.2d 885, 887 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (modification was warranted where substantial change of circumstances had occurred, including child’s school schedule and parents’ places of residence and work hours; and child’s best interests were served by modification).

THOMAS and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 So. 3d 328, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10374, 2015 WL 4106718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-morgan-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack