Moore v. Morgan

168 So. 3d 328, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10374, 2015 WL 4106718
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 8, 2015·No. No. 1D15-492·Published

Opinion

KELSEY, J.

We affirm the order on appeal, without prejudice to either party’s pursuit of modification before the trial court pursuant to section 61.13(3), Florida Statutes (2014), to address any substantial change of circumstances that may have occurred subsequent to the September 2014 hearing and January 2, 2015 order. See Wade v. Hirschman, 903 So.2d 928, 932-33 (Fla.2005) (articulating substantial change test for child custody modifications); Skirko v. Skirko, 677 So.2d 885, 887 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (modification was warranted where substantial change of circumstances had occurred, including child’s school schedule and parents’ places of residence and work hours; and child’s best interests were served by modification).

THOMAS and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. Morgan, 168 So. 3d 328, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10374, 2015 WL 4106718 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

168 So. 3d 328 (Moore v. Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wade v. Hirschman
903 So. 2d 928 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Skirko v. Skirko
677 So. 2d 885 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)