Moore v. Moore

198 P. 99, 116 Wash. 701, 1921 Wash. LEXIS 782
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 8, 1921
DocketNo. 16407
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 198 P. 99 (Moore v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. Moore, 198 P. 99, 116 Wash. 701, 1921 Wash. LEXIS 782 (Wash. 1921).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent, on March 19, 1920, was granted a decree of divorce from the appellant, which decree awarded her the custody of their six minor children, there being no appearance by the appellant. On April 16, 1920, the appellant served and filed a motion to have the decree vacated and his default set aside on the ground that the order of default and decree had been taken against him through his inadvertence and excusable neglect. The trial court entered an order refusing to vacate the decree, from which order the appellant has brought this appeal.

It is not necessary to.detail the facts alleged by the respondent as showing a reason entitling him to have his default set aside and the decree opened. It is only necessary to say, upon the authority of Jarrard v. Jarrard, ante p. 70, 198 Pac. 741, that the relief asked for by the appellant should have been granted.

The order of the trial court, refusing to set aside the default and vacate the decree, is reversed, and that court is directed to allow appellant to file his answer, and to proceed to hear the case upon its merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Smith
269 P. 821 (Washington Supreme Court, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 P. 99, 116 Wash. 701, 1921 Wash. LEXIS 782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-moore-wash-1921.