Moore v. . Moore

152 S.E. 391, 198 N.C. 510, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 392
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 19, 1930·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

*511 Pee Cueiam.

C. S., 4134, provides that subsequent marriage, with certain exceptions, revokes all prior wills made by a testator. Means v. Ury, 141 N. C., 248, 53 S. E., 850; In re Bradford, 183 N. C., 4, 110 S. E., 586.

The probate of a will in common form is binding and conclusive until set aside by a direct proceeding. Mills v. Mills, 195 N. C., 595, 143 S. E., 130; In re Will of Cooper, 196 N. C., 418, 145 S. E., 782. However, the present proceeding was treated by the parties as an action to remove the probate as a cloud upon title, and hence no point was made that the proceeding constituted a collateral attack upon the will.

Upon such state of the record the judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. . Moore, 152 S.E. 391, 198 N.C. 510, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 392 (N.C. 1930).

152 S.E. 391 (Moore v. . Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re the Will of Tenner
102 S.E.2d 391 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)
Holt v. Holt
61 S.E.2d 448 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
Cromwell v. . Bradsher
166 S.E. 331 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
In Re Will of Rowland
162 S.E. 897 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)