Moore v. . Moore

152 S.E. 391, 198 N.C. 510, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 392
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 19, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 152 S.E. 391 (Moore v. . Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. . Moore, 152 S.E. 391, 198 N.C. 510, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 392 (N.C. 1930).

Opinion

*511 Pee Cueiam.

C. S., 4134, provides that subsequent marriage, with certain exceptions, revokes all prior wills made by a testator. Means v. Ury, 141 N. C., 248, 53 S. E., 850; In re Bradford, 183 N. C., 4, 110 S. E., 586.

The probate of a will in common form is binding and conclusive until set aside by a direct proceeding. Mills v. Mills, 195 N. C., 595, 143 S. E., 130; In re Will of Cooper, 196 N. C., 418, 145 S. E., 782. However, the present proceeding was treated by the parties as an action to remove the probate as a cloud upon title, and hence no point was made that the proceeding constituted a collateral attack upon the will.

Upon such state of the record the judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Will of Tenner
102 S.E.2d 391 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)
Holt v. Holt
61 S.E.2d 448 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
Cromwell v. . Bradsher
166 S.E. 331 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
In Re Will of Rowland
162 S.E. 897 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 S.E. 391, 198 N.C. 510, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-moore-nc-1930.