Moore v. Moore

Missouri Court of Appeals

Moore v. Moore

404 S.W.3d 462, 2013 WL 3944286, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 887

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 30, 2013·No. No. WD 75650·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Sharon Rae Moore (Mother) appeals the trial court’s judgment modifying child custody. She argues that the trial court was required to appoint a guardian ad litem (GAL) pursuant to section 452.423.2 because Eric Karl Moore (Father) made allegations of neglect in his motion to modify. Mother claims that, by failing to appoint a GAL, the trial court committed reversible error. Finding no error, however, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Sharon Rae Moore (Mother) appeals the trial court’s judgment modifying child custody. She argues that the trial court was required to appoint a guardian ad litem (GAL) pursuant to section 452.423.2 because Eric Karl Moore (Father) made allegations of neglect in his motion to modify. Mother claims that, by failing to appoint a GAL, the trial court committed reversible error. Finding no error, however, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Moore v. Moore, 404 S.W.3d 462, 2013 WL 3944286, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 887 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

404 S.W.3d 462 (Moore v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.