Moore v. Moore
This text of 980 So. 2d 528 (Moore v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Helen B. MOORE, former wife, Appellant,
v.
Arthur Lee MOORE, former husband, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Harold Silver, of Law Offices of Harold Silver, P.A., Gainesville, for Appellant.
Thomas J. Kennon, III, of Robinson, Kennon, & Kendron, Lake City, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
On September 1, 2005, the trial court rendered an order granting appellee's petition for modification of certain alimony obligations. Appellant took no appeal of that order, but instead, some three months later, filed a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b). The trial court denied that motion. Appellant now seeks appellate review of rulings made by the trial court in the September 1, 2005, order. These rulings are, however, beyond the scope of this appeal, which is a vehicle solely for review of the trial court's ruling on the Rule 1.540(b) motion. See Paladin Props. v. Family Inv. Enters., 952 So.2d 560 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).
AFFIRMED.
ALLEN, KAHN, and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
980 So. 2d 528, 2008 WL 420233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-moore-fladistctapp-2008.