Moore v. Moore

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Moore v. Moore

602 So. 2d 691, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8976, 1992 WL 187236

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 5, 1992

DocketNo. 91-03509

StatusPublished

This text of 602 So. 2d 691 (Moore v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. Moore, 602 So. 2d 691, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8976, 1992 WL 187236 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

DANAHY, Judge.

The appellee having correctly and commendably confessed error on the basis of our recent decision in State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Harvey, 593 So.2d 611 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), we, again, as in Harvey, reverse the order requiring HRS to pay the prevailing party’s fees in this action brought pursuant to section 409.2567, Florida Statutes (1989).

Reversed.

RYDER, A.C.J., and BLUE, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DANAHY, Judge.

The appellee having correctly and commendably confessed error on the basis of our recent decision in State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Harvey, 593 So.2d 611 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), we, again, as in Harvey, reverse the order requiring HRS to pay the prevailing party’s fees in this action brought pursuant to section 409.2567, Florida Statutes (1989).

Reversed.

RYDER, A.C.J., and BLUE, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

602 So. 2d 691, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8976, 1992 WL 187236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-moore-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack