Moore v. Mohican Co.

175 A.D. 964, 161 N.Y.S. 1135, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8693

This text of 175 A.D. 964 (Moore v. Mohican Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. Mohican Co., 175 A.D. 964, 161 N.Y.S. 1135, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8693 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Kruse, P. J. (dissenting):

I dissent. I think the case was submitted to the jury upon too narrow a ground, but even at that it seems to me there is evidence to sustain the verdict. It does not seem useful to send the case back simply on the ground that it is against the weight of the evidence. There is abundant proof to show that the floor was not oiled in the usual way, but in a manner to make it unusually slippery, causing people to fall, as was shown by the evidence of actual occurrences. I vote for affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 A.D. 964, 161 N.Y.S. 1135, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-mohican-co-nyappdiv-1916.