Moore v. Mississippi

Supreme Court

Moore v. Mississippi

338 U.S. 844, 70 S. Ct. 93

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 17, 1949

DocketNo. 323

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 338 U.S. 844 (Moore v. Mississippi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. Mississippi, 338 U.S. 844, 70 S. Ct. 93 (1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 28 U. S. C. § 1257 (2). [845]*845Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by 28 U. S. C. § 2103, certiorari is denied.

Appellant pro se. Greek L. Rice, Attorney General of Mississippi, and George H. Ethridge, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 28 U. S. C. § 1257 (2). [845]*845Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by 28 U. S. C. § 2103, certiorari is denied.

Appellant pro se. Greek L. Rice, Attorney General of Mississippi, and George H. Ethridge, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

338 U.S. 844, 70 S. Ct. 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-mississippi-scotus-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack