Moore v. M'Ewen
5 Serg. & Rawle 373
This text of 5 Serg. & Rawle 373 (Moore v. M'Ewen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Moore v. M'Ewen, 5 Serg. & Rawle 373 (Pa. 1819).
Opinion
We are of opinion, that by the plea of in ' nullo est erratum, it is confessed that Reuben Moore, junr. an infant, did appear by attorney; and we are also of opinion, that the appearance of an infant by attorney in the Court below, is assignable for error in this Court. It was so decided in Sliver v. Shelback, 1 Dall. 165. The judgment must therefore be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Watson v. Mercer
17 Serg. & Rawle 343 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1828)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 Serg. & Rawle 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-mewen-pa-1819.