Moore v. M'Ewen
5 Serg. & Rawle 373
Opinion
We are of opinion, that by the plea of in ' nullo est erratum, it is confessed that Reuben Moore, junr. an infant, did appear by attorney; and we are also of opinion, that the appearance of an infant by attorney in the Court below, is assignable for error in this Court. It was so decided in Sliver v. Shelback, 1 Dall. 165. The judgment must therefore be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moore v. M'Ewen, 5 Serg. & Rawle 373 (Pa. 1819).
5 Serg. & Rawle 373 (Moore v. M'Ewen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Watson v. Mercer
17 Serg. & Rawle 343 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1828)