Moore v. McNulty

Missouri Court of Appeals

Moore v. McNulty

76 Mo. App. 379, 1898 Mo. App. LEXIS 199

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 1, 1898

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 76 Mo. App. 379 (Moore v. McNulty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. McNulty, 76 Mo. App. 379, 1898 Mo. App. LEXIS 199 (Mo. Ct. App. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Bland, P. J.

Motion to transfer to the supreme court is sustained, for the reason that the suit is to contest the will of one Charles L. Moore, deceased by which will real estate was devised to the respondents, [380]*380that should the contestants (appellants) succeed in setting aside the will, the lands devised would pass to appellants as the heirs at law of Charles L. Moore, hence the title to lands described in the will and petitions is involved, and the cause is ordered to be transferred to the supreme court.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bland, P. J.

Motion to transfer to the supreme court is sustained, for the reason that the suit is to contest the will of one Charles L. Moore, deceased by which will real estate was devised to the respondents, [380]*380that should the contestants (appellants) succeed in setting aside the will, the lands devised would pass to appellants as the heirs at law of Charles L. Moore, hence the title to lands described in the will and petitions is involved, and the cause is ordered to be transferred to the supreme court.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 Mo. App. 379, 1898 Mo. App. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-mcnulty-moctapp-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack