Moore v. McCollum

62 N.W. 41, 43 Neb. 617, 1895 Neb. LEXIS 383
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided February 5, 1895·No. No. 5952·Published

Opinion

Norval, C. J.

At the present term a motion was submitted by the defendants in error to dismiss the petition in error for want of prosecution. This cause was submitted for decision upon its merits at the September term, 1893, without briefs- or oral argument. The motion to dismiss, therefore, comes-too late. Such a motion, to be of any avail, must be presented before the final submission of the cause upon the merits.

No brief having been filed by either party, and the judgment conforming to the pleadings and evidence, it is accordingly affirmed. (Phenix Ins. Co. v. Reams, 37 Neb., 423; Brown v. Dunn, 38 Neb., 52; Damon v. City of Omaha, 38 Neb., 583; Langdon v. Campbell, 43 Neb., 67.)

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. McCollum, 62 N.W. 41, 43 Neb. 617, 1895 Neb. LEXIS 383 (Neb. 1895).

62 N.W. 41 (Moore v. McCollum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Phenix Insurance v. Reams
55 N.W. 1074 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1893)
Brown v. Dunn
56 N.W. 703 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1893)
Damon v. City of Omaha
57 N.W. 287 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1894)
Langdon v. Campbell
61 N.W. 84 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1894)