Moore v. Maddock

Supreme Court of Missouri

Moore v. Maddock

33 Mo. 575

Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided March 15, 1863·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bates, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Suit by payees of a promissory note against the maker. Defence that the note was made by the defendant at the plaintiffs’ request, and without any consideration. At the trial these facts were admitted by the plaintiffs, and judgment was given for the defendant, as it should have been. The admission excludes the idea that he signed it as surety.

Judgment affirmed ;

Judges Bay and Dryden concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bates, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Suit by payees of a promissory note against the maker. Defence that the note was made by the defendant at the plaintiffs’ request, and without any consideration. At the trial these facts were admitted by the plaintiffs, and judgment was given for the defendant, as it should have been. The admission excludes the idea that he signed it as surety.

Judgment affirmed ;

Judges Bay and Dryden concur.

Moore v. Maddock, 33 Mo. 575 (Mo. 1863).

Pincite

33 Mo. 575 (Moore v. Maddock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related