Moore v. Lowery

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Moore v. Lowery

758 So. 2d 737, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5810, 2000 WL 628236

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 17, 2000

DocketNo. 3D00-573

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 758 So. 2d 737 (Moore v. Lowery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. Lowery, 758 So. 2d 737, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5810, 2000 WL 628236 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court was without jurisdiction or authority to require the Department of Corrections to refrain from cutting the defendant’s hair, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the order is quashed. Department of Juvenile Justice v. J.R., 710 So.2d 211 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Singletary v. Acosta, 659 So.2d 449 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). This action is without prejudice to an appropriate application to withdraw the respondent’s guilty plea.

Certiorari granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court was without jurisdiction or authority to require the Department of Corrections to refrain from cutting the defendant’s hair, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the order is quashed. Department of Juvenile Justice v. J.R., 710 So.2d 211 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Singletary v. Acosta, 659 So.2d 449 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). This action is without prejudice to an appropriate application to withdraw the respondent’s guilty plea.

Certiorari granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

758 So. 2d 737, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5810, 2000 WL 628236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-lowery-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack