Moore v. Love
This text of 2 Miss. Dec. 724 (Moore v. Love) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion.
The case is determinable by the rule announced in Martin v. Harden, 52 Miss. 694.
The case of Fenn v. Harrington, 54 Miss. 733, furnishes tho rule applicable to cases in which it is uncertain what is the principal of the amount in controversy, and not to those in which the facts are not in dispute, and where computation will show exactly what is the principal of the amount sued for.
We agree with counsel for the appellant as to the duty to indulge every presumption not inconsistent with the record of the validity of the judgment, but the record plainly shows that the case was not within the jurisdiction of the justice of the peace, and that the judgment is, therefore, void.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Miss. Dec. 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-love-miss-1882.