Moore v. Kendall

73 S.E. 542, 10 Ga. App. 375, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 518
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 15, 1912·No. 3587·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Hell, C. J.

The presumption of ownership arising from the recital made by the levying officer in the entry of the levy, that the property levied upon was in the possession of the defendant in fi. fa. at the time of the levy, was fully rebutted by the undisputed evidence in behalf of the claimant. The verdict in the justice’s court finding the property subject was contrary to law,, because it was without any evidence to support it, and in direct conflict with the undisputed evidence. The certiorari by the claimant should have been sustained by the judge of the superior court. . Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. Kendall, 73 S.E. 542, 10 Ga. App. 375, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 518 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

73 S.E. 542 (Moore v. Kendall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vickers v. Calhoun Service Station
4 S.E.2d 676 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Nolley v. Elliott
178 S.E. 309 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Holt v. Daniel
170 S.E. 383 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Pritchett v. Bagby
169 S.E. 211 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Scruggs v. Blackshear Manufacturing Co.
166 S.E. 249 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Jenkins v. Best Trading Co.
146 S.E. 512 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)