Moore v. Joyce

23 Miss. 584
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1852
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 23 Miss. 584 (Moore v. Joyce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. Joyce, 23 Miss. 584 (Mich. 1852).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Fisher

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action of assumpsit in the circuit court of Harrison county by the defendant in error, upon an account for services rendered as a physician, and for medicines furnished to the plaintiff in error.

The error of the court is alleged to consist in the following charges, given to the jury on the motion of the plaintiff’s counsel below.

1. That if the items of the account have been proved, it is not necessary to prove that the plaintiff kept correct books. This charge is undoubtedly correct.

2. That it was for the jury to say, whether the account of plaintiff has been proved or not, and that they have a right to presume that all the items are correct, if the most of them have been positively proved, or not as they shall see proper.

The first part of this charge, which merely submitted to the jury to decide upon the testimony before them, was correct as [585]*585a general rule; but it was clearly wrong to instruct the jury, that proof of most of the items in the account was sufficient.

It is only necessary to refer to the rule laid down by this court, in the case of Simmons v. Means, 8 S. & M. 397. The plaintiff must either prove his account by direct and positive proof, or show that he keeps correct books, and that his account has been correctly transcribed. This last is but circumstantial evidence, and a party resorting to it must come within the rule established in the above case, and the case therein referred to.

Judgment reversed ; new trial granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Webb
1936 OK 846 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1936)
W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Scott
132 So. 84 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1931)
Howerton v. Joplin Supply Co.
1924 OK 1148 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)
Whitcomb v. Oller
1913 OK 754 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Pipes v. Norton
47 Miss. 61 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1872)
Moody v. J. M. Roberts & Co.
41 Miss. 74 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1866)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 Miss. 584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-joyce-miss-1852.